A következő címkéjű bejegyzések mutatása: Escher. Összes bejegyzés megjelenítése
A következő címkéjű bejegyzések mutatása: Escher. Összes bejegyzés megjelenítése

2026. február 25., szerda

IN PARIS - WITH ESCHER

 

A friend of mine in Paris sent me a message saying that she had seen my work at the major retrospective Escher exhibition at the Monnaie de Paris museum. Alongside the master's works, the exhibition also featured pieces by several artists who can be considered precursors or successors of M. C. Escher. Piranesi was there as a predecessor, Reutersvard as a contemporary, and I was there as a successor with my work Stairs. Since the exhibition, which has been open since November, will only be open until March 1, I had to hurry. I was really surprised by how many people are still interested in Escher today. The gatekeeper threw up his hands: all tickets had been sold in advance. I was forced to admit that I also had something hanging in one of the rooms, so I was lucky enough to get in after all. The Stairs (sometimes also exhibited under the title Time Sights) was transferred to the Paris exhibition from the Maurits Collection in Italy. It seems that I have several pictures in the Maurits Collection, at least according to the information on the Internet. I am also attaching The Corner House. 





2023. december 25., hétfő

IMPOSSIBLE XMAS TREE

 

 Let me post my Christmas tree here, it's not a new work, it was already here on the Utis Blog a few years ago, but not many people commented then. Yesterday I posted it on theFacebook, where it got over 500 likes and 22 shares in one day. I didn't look at how many times the shares were re-shared and how many times they were liked, but one thing caught my eye. The page named after Escher has 1.3 K likes and 767 shares (on Christmas Day morning). Since the uploader did not name the author (me), the more uninformed viewer is entitled to believe it is the work of M. C. Escher. In fact, Escher also dealt with probably the best known and simplest example of "impossible objects", the "tribad", more "scientifically" known as the Penrose triangle. It has been used so much in the visual arts, design, advertising and even psychology, and has become such a well-known symbol in the 20th century, that we hardly even think about questioning its origins. The curious triangle is called the Penrose triangle because it was first published in 1958 in an English psychology journal by the later renowned mathematician Roger Penrose, who won the Nobel Prize last year. But he was far from "discovering it". In Sweden, a young man called Oscar Reutersvärd had invented it decades earlier and drawn it.  "In Latin class (in 1934), I drew some sketches in the margin of a grammar book. I tried to edit the 4,5,6,7 and 8-pointed asterisks as accurately as possible. One day, I was drawing a six-pointed star with cubes on the sides. I got a surprisingly interesting shape. I added three more cubes to make a triangle. I immediately realized that what I had in front of me was a paradox."  The above recollection is from a letter Reuterswärdnak wrote to his friend, the Dutch mathematician Hans de Rijk, who, under the pen name Bruno Ernst, wrote the best books on visual paradoxes, and his compatriot Escher. From him we learn that Reuterswärd, having become familiar with Escher's increasingly popular oeuvre, including some Penrose triangle paraphrase, tried to contact him by letter, mentioning that he himself was experimenting with similar 'impossibilities', but received no reply from Escher. Yes, even the greatest people can have their moments of weakness. Whether the 'tribad' was drawn by someone before Reuterswärd, I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised if it appeared in the sketches of, say, Armand Thiéry, Louis Albert Necker or Henrich Schröder, since it already appears in Giovanni Battista Piranesi's Prison Sculptures of the mid-1700s, even if it is not easy to pick out among the architectural elements that are so proliferating. But there it is!

2019. március 30., szombat

EPREUVE D' ARTISTE

In deze tentoonstelling maakt U kennis met 2 uiteenlopende fantasiewerelden die tegelijkertijd toch een onderliggende gemeenschappelijke basis hebben.
De Hongaarse kunstenaar Istvan Orosz  en de Poolse Marcin Bialas scheppen beiden een eigen  universum, ontsproten uit hun  unieke  menselijke geest , maar toch bewust of onbewust geïnspireerd  door de impressies van beelden gemaakt door beroemde voorgangers zoals in dit geval Maurits Cornelis  Escher.

Op totaal verschillende wijze creëren ze een universum van steden en gebouwen waar de mens op een bevreemdende manier in ronddwaalt. Ons oog en onze geest worden in verwarring gebracht, enkel met verwondering  en bewondering kunnen we naar deze prenten kijken.

Van 24 maart tot 7 april.
Epreuve d’Artiste | Graphic Art Gallery
Chris Verheyen: chrisverheyen55@gmail.com | 0032(0)477 234095
Lucienne Verheyen: info@epreuvedartiste.be | 0032(0)3 2386858
Oudekerkstraat 64 | 2018 Antwerpen | Belgium
Openingsuren: zaterdag & zondag – 14.00 – 18.00 (tijdens expo’s) of op afspraak.

(Photo: Daniel Köster)

2016. május 8., vasárnap

DONALD, MICK AND MAURITS



Is there any connection between Donald Trump and M.C. Escher? I mean the U.S. presidential candidate and the Dutch craftsman. (By the way he is my favorite graphic artist.) You say that it is impossible? O.K. The key figure is nobody else but Mick Jagger. I read in the news, that the Rolling Stones have told Donald Trump to stop playing their songs during his presidential campaign. The band have issued a statement saying that the presidential candidate does not have permission to use the band's music.
In the beginning of 1969, Mick Jagger wrote a letter to Escher asking him to provide an image for the Rolling Stones' forthcoming record cover. Here is his letter: 
Dear Maurits,
For quite some time now I have had in my possession your book (Graphic Works Of...) and it never ceases to amaze me each time I study it! In fact I think your work is quite incredible and it would make me very happy for a lot more people to see and know and understand exactly what you are doing. In March or April this year, we have scheduled our next LP record for release, and I am most eager to reproduce one of your works on the cover-sleeve. Would you please consider either designing a "picture" for it, or have you any unpublished works which you might think suitable -the "optical illusion" idea very much appeals to me, although one like "Evolution" would of course be equally as suitable. -and would say the same thing. You might even like to do a long one like "Metamorphosis" which we could then reproduce as a folding-out sleeve. It could be either in one colour or full colour, that would be up to you entirely. Naturally, both you and your publishers would get full credits on the sleeve, and we could negotiate a fee on hearing of your decision to do it. I would be most grateful if you could contact Peter Swales or Miss Jo Bergman at the above address or telephone (reverse charge), and either will give you every necessary assistance. However, I am not so fortunate as to possess a Dutch interpreter, and so if you do not speak English or French, I would again be grateful if you could fix up somebody in Baarn to oblige.
Yours very sincerely,
Mick Jagger (for ROLLING STONES LTD.)

Here is Escher's response:
Dear Sir [addressed to Mr. Peter Swales],
Some days ago I received a letter from Mr. Jagger asking me to design a picture or to place at his disposal unpublished work to reproduce on the cover-sleeve for an LP record. My answer to both questions must be no, as I want to devote all my time and attention to the many commitments I made; I cannot possibly accept any further assignments or spend any time on publicity.
By the way, please tell Mr. Jagger I am not Maurits to him, but

Very sincerely,
M. C. Escher

(Conundrum: We know that Jagger is an Escher fan, and Escher is NOT a Stones fan, and Trump is a Stones fun, and Stones is NOT a Trump fun. I wonder if Trump is familiar with the work of Escher. Maybe he is an Escher fun too. But it is hard to imagine Escher to be a Trump fun. Not only because he does not live.)